A prospective study to evaluate the contribution of the pediatric appendicitis score in the decision process.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the likelihood of acute appendicitis (AA) in children presenting with abdominal symptoms at the emergency department (ED), based on their prior primary care (PC) consultation history. METHODS: Between February and June 2021, we prospectively enrolled all children presenting at the ED with acute abdominal pain indicative of possible acute appendicitis (AA). Subsequently, they were categorized into three groups: those assessed by a PC physician (PG), those brought in by their family without a prior consultation (FG), and those admitted after a PC consultation without being assessed as such. The primary objective was to assess the probability of AA diagnosis using the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS). Secondary objectives included analyzing PAS and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels based on the duration of pain and final diagnoses. RESULTS: 124 children were enrolled in the study (PG, n = 56; FG, n = 55; NG, n = 13). Among them, 29 patients (23.4%) were diagnosed with AA, with 13 cases (23.2%) from the PG and 14 cases (25.4%) from the FG. The mean PAS scores for AA cases from the PG and FG were 6.69 ± 1.75 and 7.57 ± 1.6, respectively, (p = 0.3340). Both PAS scores and CRP levels showed a significant correlation with AA severity. No cases of AA were observed with PAS scores < 4. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in PAS scores between patients addressed by PG and FG, even though PAS scores tended to be higher for patients with AA. We propose a new decision-making algorithm for PC practice, which incorporates inflammatory markers and pain duration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional Ethics Committee registration number: 447-2021-103 (10/01/2021). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04885335 (Registered on 13/05/2021).

Patterns, predictors, and outcomes of frailty trajectories in community-dwelling older adults: Results from the FREEDOM Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify subgroups of people with distinct frailty trajectories, identify baseline characteristics associated with these trajectories, and determine their coincident clinical outcomes. DESIGN: This study examined the longitudinal database from the FREEDOM Cohort Study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All 497 participants of the FREEDOM (French Acronym for "FRagilitéEtEvaluation àDOMicile" / In English "Frailty and Evaluation at Home") cohort requested a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Community-dwelling subjects over 75 years, or over 65 years with at least two comorbidities were included. METHODS: Frailty was assessed using Fried's criteria, depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and cognitive function using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire. Frailty trajectories were modelled using k-means algorithms. Predictive factors were determined by multivariate logistic regression. Clinical outcomes included incident cognitive deficit, falls and hospitalization. RESULTS: The trajectory models allowed determine four frailty trajectories: "robust stable" (Trajectory A, 26.8%), "pre-frail worsening to frailty" (Trajectory B, 35.8%), "frail improving to less frailty" (Trajectory C, 23.3%), and "frail worsening to more frailty" (Trajectory D, 14.1%). Trajectory B was associated with age (OR 1.2 (95CI, 1.05 - 1.17)), potential cognitive deficit/dementia (OR 2.01 (95CI, 1.01- 4.05)) and depressive symptoms (OR 2.36 (95CI, 1.36 - 4.12)). Hypertension was distinguishing factor between" trajectory B vs. C and D. Depressive symptoms were two time more associated with D (OR 10.51) vs. C (OR 4.55). The incidence of clinical outcomes was significantly increased in poor frailty trajectories. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study allowed to determine frailty trajectories among older subjects requested a comprehensive geriatric assessment. The more significant predictive factors associated with poor frailty trajectory were advanced in age, potential cognitive deficit/dementia, depressive symptoms and hypertension. This emphasizes the need for adequate measures to controlled hypertension, depressive symptoms and to maintain or improve cognition in older adults.

Risk factors of frailty and functional disability in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the FREEDOM-LNA cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a geriatric syndrome associated with disability and negative health outcome. To determine the factors associated with frailty and functional disability in older participants living in community in France. We included 753 community-dwelling old participants with available frailty data at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 31.9% were frail, 58.3% were prefrail, and 9.8% were robust. The SMAF (French acronym for Functional Autonomy Measurement System) score was significantly lower (mean ± standard deviation: -25.8 ± 11.2) in frail participants compared to prefrail (-14.3 ± 9.7) or robust participants (-8.1 ± 7.0); 82% of frail older participants had limitation in at least one ADL and 97.5% in at least one IADL compared to 54.2 and 76.8%, respectively of pre-frail and 29.7 and 47.3% of robust participants. Age, depression, impaired cognition and diabetes were significantly associated with higher odds of frailty. These variables were also strongly associated with functional disability. Female gender, polypharmacy, and smoking were additional variables significantly associated with degraded SMAF and/or ADL/IADL. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that functional disability increased proportionally to frailty, and depression, cognitive decline and diabetes are modifiable risk factors significantly associated with frailty and functional disability.

Frailty and functional dependence in older population: lessons from the FREEDOM Limousin - Nouvelle Aquitaine Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring frailty indicators in elderly people is recommended to identify those who could benefit from disability prevention programs. To contribute to the understanding of the development of frailty in the elderly, we have created the FREEDOM-LNA cohort constituting an observational study of ageing in general population. Here, we described the characteristics of a cohort of elderly subjects who are followed for determination of frailty and loss of independence trajectories. RESULTS: The cohort was composed of 1085 subjects in advanced age (mean: 83.7 ± 6.0 years) and of women in majority (68.3%). Cardiovascular risk factors were present in 88.4% of subjects. Abnormal musculoskeletal signs were reported in 44.0% and neurologic signs in 31.9%. There were 44.8% of subjects at risk of malnutrition (MNA <24) and 73.3% (668/911) at risk of mobility-related disability (SPPB ≤9); 39% (384/973) of subjects had impaired cognitive function (MMSE< 24, adjusted on education) and 49.0% (397/810) had signs of depression (GDS >9); 31.8% (240/753) were frail and 58.3% were pre-frail. Most subjects had at least one disability in ADL (66.9%) and IADL (85.1%). The SMAF indicated a loss of independence in 59.6%. Overall, 59.9% of subjects could not stay at home without at least some help. Consequently, a medical consultation was proposed in 68.2 and 42.1% social supports. CONCLUSIONS: A large part of this cohort was frail or pre-frail and presented signs of loss of independence, which may be explained by multiple factors including impaired health status, poor physical performance, cognition, isolation, depression, or nutrition. This cohort will help to determine factors that adversely influence the trajectory of physical frailty over time.

Describing perceived stigma against Alzheimer's disease in a general population in France: the STIG-MA survey.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes progressive loss of memory and disability, especially in older people. As worldwide population grows older, AD is responsible for an important social and economical burden in many nations. People suffering from AD may experience health-related stigma that influences their attitudes towards seeking assistance. The STIG-MA survey describes perceived stigma against AD in a French population. METHODS: The STIG-MA questionnaire was completed anonymously by people attending an awareness campaign about AD in Creuse, France, in September 2010. Participants answered 10 questions about how they would feel or react if they had AD. Stigma scores were compared by age, activity, and interest in AD. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of people attending the campaign filled out the survey. Most were women (85%) younger than 50 years (59%); 10% were older people (older than 75 years). Twenty-one percent worked in health or social fields. Interest in AD was professional (48%), related to family (41%), or personal (11%). Professionals in health fields expressed the highest levels of stigma (p = 0.02). Low stigma was most frequent in older people (p = 0.05). Type of interest did not influence stigma. Shame, loss of self-esteem, and fear of exclusion were expressed the most. CONCLUSION: The STIG-MA survey confirms that AD is a stigmatizing condition in France. The difference between perceived stigma of older people, those most exposed to AD, and that of health professionals may influence attitudes towards screening and care. Further studies of perceived stigma in these populations are necessary to adapt intervention strategies.